What I think about a
`woman’s right to choose’, life or death.
The design of a woman’s body is specifically organized
to reproduce life through bearing of children, whether you believe it was
designed by a God or by evolution is not important at this point.
It is an individual woman’s choice how she will make use of her own
body, as long as it is her own body we are speaking about.
She may use any contraceptive procedure she chooses, as that decision
is strictly between her and her God, or whomever she places confidence in
their opinions. When she comes to
a point of having unprotected sex, she has given up the authority to decide
and placed the result in the hands of God or chance, which ever she may
believe. If a new life is formed
after she has relieved herself of the choice to protect against pregnancy, any
choice to turn back now is a new and different decision.
This new decision is whether one has the right to murder someone else
for the enrichment of another. It
matters not if the new life is still in the womb or if it is 3 years later.
When it comes to 'babies'
having babies, the young girls mother has chosen for her by not educating her
daughter and now has the responsibility as though she was caring the fetus
herself.
Summary:
A woman may choose what to do with her body until she
chooses not to choose.
Her choice ends with unprotected sex.
She has chosen to let life take its course.
Once committed it to be the resolution of another,
the commitment is not revocable.
Law may uphold the woman’s choice beyond sex if the
sex was not in her choosing, however natural order of life does not
authorize murder under any circumstances. A
child’s life should never be ended due to the indiscretion of the
father, or the mother for that matter; age of the new life is not a
factor.
